SOC 2 compliance provides independent assurance that a video streaming platform has effective security controls in place. This guide explains SOC 2, its five Trust Services Criteria, Type I and Type II reports, the audit process, and how Muvi’s security infrastructure supports secure, reliable streaming. Continue reading
Video streaming platforms handle sensitive data, from subscriber and payment details to viewing activity and licensed content. That makes data security a key concern for customers and content owners. SOC 2 compliance provides independent proof that a company has the right security controls in place. It is often an important part of enterprise security reviews and content licensing agreements.
In this guide, we explain what SOC 2 is, its five Trust Services Criteria, Type I vs. Type II reports, what a SOC 2 audit involves, and why it matters for video streaming platforms. We also look at Muvi’s SOC 2 program and security infrastructure.
SOC 2, short for System and Organization Controls 2, is a security and compliance framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). It sets a standard for how service providers should manage and protect customer data, and it is verified through an independent audit rather than a self-assessment.
One point trips up a lot of buyers and vendors alike: SOC 2 is not a government-issued certification. It is an attestation. An independent, licensed CPA firm examines a company’s controls against a defined set of criteria and issues a report on how well those controls are designed and operating. That is why it is more accurate to describe a platform as SOC 2 compliant, or as having completed a SOC 2 audit, than as SOC 2 certified.
It helps to see how this sits next to ISO 27001, a framework many platforms hold as well. ISO 27001 is a certification awarded against an international information security standard; SOC 2 is an attestation report from an independent auditor. The two are complementary rather than competing, and Muvi holds both, with its SOC 2 program built directly on the ISO 27001:2022 framework it is already certified against.
For cloud businesses that handle sensitive customer data, including video platforms, SaaS providers, and other digital services, SOC 2 compliance has become one of the most widely recognized ways to demonstrate security maturity. It signals that an outside expert has examined the platform, not just that the platform says it is secure.
SOC 2 is built on a framework known as the Trust Services Criteria (TSC). These five criteria define what an auditor evaluates. Security is the baseline that every SOC 2 audit covers, and a company scopes in the others based on how it operates and what its customers expect. For a video streaming platform, each criterion has a practical meaning tied to how content and viewer data are handled.
Security covers protecting systems against unauthorized access, both physical and logical. In practice that means controls such as encryption, firewalls, network monitoring, and multi-factor authentication. For a streaming platform, this is what stands between an attacker and a content library or a subscriber database, and it is the foundation the other criteria build on.
Availability means systems are accessible and operating as committed. For most software this is about uptime and redundancy. For video it is sharper: a live event or a launch window is unforgiving, and an outage during peak concurrency is lost revenue and lost trust in the same moment. Availability controls cover monitoring, failover, and the capacity planning that keeps streams running when demand spikes.
Processing integrity confirms that systems do what they are supposed to do, completely and accurately. For a streaming platform that spans transcoding and playback fidelity, so what a creator uploads is what a viewer sees, as well as accurate billing and entitlement, so subscribers are charged correctly and can access exactly the content their plan allows.
Confidentiality focuses on protecting information that is meant to stay restricted. In streaming, that often includes pre-release footage, licensed content with contractual protection requirements, and internal or gated libraries. Controls such as access restrictions, expiring links, and domain-level playback rules keep sensitive content in front of the right audience and no one else.
Privacy governs how personal data is collected, used, retained, and shared, in line with company policy and applicable law. Video platforms gather a lot of it, from account details to viewing history. Meeting this criterion means aligning with regulations such as GDPR and CCPA, handling consent properly, and giving customers control over how viewer data is stored and where.
A SOC 2 audit can result in one of two report types, and the difference matters when you are evaluating a vendor. Both are measured against the same Trust Services Criteria, but they differ in depth.
A SOC 2 Type I report assesses whether controls are properly designed at a single point in time. It is a snapshot that proves a platform has the right controls in place on a given date, and it is often where younger companies begin their compliance journey.
A SOC 2 Type II report goes further. It tests whether those controls actually operated effectively over a defined period, typically between three and twelve months. Because it measures real operation over time rather than design on paper, it offers stronger assurance and is generally what enterprises, financial institutions, and large content owners look for.
The practical differences come down to a few points:
A SOC 2 audit is carried out by an independent, licensed CPA firm. Only CPAs or accounting firms affiliated with the AICPA can perform one, and they often work alongside security specialists on the technical portions. The audit is not a quick scan. The auditor reviews documentation, tests the controls in scope, and may observe day-to-day operations to confirm that policies are not just written down but followed.
Scoping comes first: the company and auditor agree on which Trust Services Criteria apply, which systems are covered, and, for a Type II report, over what period. The auditor then gathers evidence, tests each control, and documents any exceptions. The result is a detailed report that the company can share with customers, usually under a non-disclosure agreement because it contains sensitive security detail.
For the buyer on the other side, that report does real work. It replaces a stack of security questionnaires with a recognized reference point, gives procurement and security teams something concrete to review, and shortens the path to approving a platform as a trusted vendor.
Muvi’s SOC 2 program did not start from a blank page. Muvi LLC is an ISO 27001:2022 certified organization, and its entire SOC 2 program is built on that same information security framework. That gives the SOC 2 controls a mature foundation: the policies, risk processes, and governance that ISO 27001 requires already sit underneath them, so the audit builds on an established security management system rather than a fresh set of documents.
The assessment examined controls across five areas, organized by department and role rather than as a single technical checklist: IT and infrastructure, cloud, the software development lifecycle (SDLC), governance, and human resources. Structuring it this way means security is evaluated where it actually lives, from how code is shipped to production to how employees are onboarded and trained.
Within those areas, the program covers the control domains that matter most for a platform handling customer data:
Video streaming platforms face risks like content piracy, account attacks, and payment fraud. And the data mix is unusually broad, combining personal information, payment data, viewing behavior, and, for many platforms, licensed content that carries its own contractual security requirements.
That combination raises the stakes on the criteria in scope all at once. Security, availability, and confidentiality are critical for protecting content, accounts, and revenue while meeting content owners’ expectations.
This is why SOC 2 compliance carries particular weight for a secure video platform. Increasingly, enterprise buyers and content licensors treat it as a baseline requirement rather than a differentiator.
SOC 2 compliance is easier to demonstrate when a platform is built on secure foundations from the start. Muvi runs on enterprise-grade cloud infrastructure, with product controls that line up closely with the three criteria in scope.
On the Security side, Muvi applies encryption for data in transit and at rest, along with access controls such as single sign-on (SSO) and role-based access that keep sensitive systems limited to the right people under a least-privilege model. Content protection is handled with multi-DRM support across Widevine, PlayReady, and FairPlay, plus watermarking and domain-level playback restrictions that guard high-value content against piracy and unauthorized sharing.
For Availability and business continuity, Muvi’s cloud infrastructure is designed for high uptime, with figures ranging from 99.99% to 99.999% depending on plan tier, backed by redundancy, proactive monitoring, and disaster-recovery practices. Automated backups with 7-day, 15-day, and 30-day retention tiers protect against data loss and support recovery if something goes wrong.
Confidentiality is reinforced through the same access controls, together with expiring and secure links, domain restrictions, and data classification and handling practices that keep restricted and licensed content protected. Taken together, these controls give Muvi’s platform the monitoring, access management, and resilience a SOC 2 audit is designed to examine, and they extend across the Muvi ecosystem, from Muvi One and Muvi Live to Muvi Playout, Muvi Flex, and Muvi Meet.
SOC 2 compliance is not a box a platform ticks once. It reflects an ongoing discipline of designing, operating, and improving the controls that keep customer data safe, verified by people outside the company who have no reason to grade on a curve. For a video streaming platform, where content, revenue, and viewer trust all ride on the same infrastructure, that discipline is the difference between winning enterprise business and getting stuck in security review.
Muvi is built to support that standard. Its SOC 2 program sits on an ISO 27001:2022 foundation, and its encryption, access controls, content protection, monitoring, and resilient cloud infrastructure map directly to the criteria a SOC 2 audit examines. As threats evolve, those controls evolve with them.
Secure your streaming platform with Muvi. Get a free 14-day trial today.
Yes. Muvi has completed its SOC 2 audit, covering the Security, Availability, and Confidentiality criteria. Muvi LLC is also an ISO 27001:2022 certified organization, and its SOC 2 program is built on that same framework.
Not exactly. SOC 2 results in an attestation report issued by an independent CPA firm, not a certificate from a governing body. For that reason it is more accurate to say a company is SOC 2 compliant or has completed a SOC 2 audit than to say it is SOC 2 certified. ISO 27001, by contrast, is a certification.
A SOC 2 Type I report evaluates whether controls are properly designed at a single point in time. A Type II report tests whether those controls operated effectively over a period, usually three to twelve months, which makes it the more rigorous and more widely requested of the two.
Security applies to every SOC 2 audit and is essential for protecting content and subscriber data. Availability matters because streaming uptime is revenue-critical, and Confidentiality matters when a platform hosts pre-release or licensed content. These are the three criteria in scope for Muvi’s report. Processing Integrity and Privacy can be added depending on billing complexity and the regions a platform serves.
The observation window for a Type II report is typically three to twelve months, because the auditor is testing how controls operate over time. Preparation and evidence gathering can add to that timeline, which is why many platforms complete a Type I report first and move to Type II afterward.
Written by: Shivashish
Shivashish works as a content writer at Muvi. He has worked in domains like e-commerce, employee engagement, sports and entertainment. A poet by heart, Shivashish believes in creating quality content that is rich in information and easy to understand.
One Platform, Infinite Streaming Possibilities
Live & On-Demand, Audio & Video, Mobile & TV Apps, Player, and Monetization
Start free trialNo credit card required.
Add your comment